Richard gets antsy every time I use language like "the spiritual path". Says he, everyone is different, everyone has their own path, there is not one path but many paths. "This is what the Buddhists say", he adds. I feel I need to clear this up a bit, i.e.:
- the paradox that, while it is true that there are as many "life paths" as there are people, people who declare themselves to be "on a spiritual path" know exactly what path they are talking about (we don’t say "which path?"), they know they are talking on "the path to get from here to there";
- what Buddhists actually recommend as the way to get "there".
"One word on Buddhism, as it is my current "hobby" :-)
Actually Buddhists often refer to "the path to enlightenment", like as if there was only one path. One way to describe it is the "Noble eight-fold path", which is also the fourth "Noble truth of Buddhism". No need to be a Buddhist to follow this path, and no need to follow anyone. From a Buddhist perspective there are no Buddhists and there is no such thing as Buddhism: for Buddhists, we are all Buddhas whether we know it or not! What we seek to do is get in touch with our Buddha nature, our "true face", i.e. our full development as humans – and Gautama Buddha endeavored to give us a recipe to get there. The eight folds of the Noble eight-fold path are:
- Wisdom training:
- right views
- right intentions
- Ethics training:
- right speech
- right action
- right livelihood
- Meditation training:
- right effort
- right mindfulness
- right concentration.
Each "fold" is declined in many chapters, paragraphs, etc, which constitute hundreds of books (a bit like a huge Bible) that is called the Dharma (or the Truth). The four "Noble truths" are:
- Life is suffering
- The cause of suffering is attachment
- There is a way out of suffering for everybody
- That way is the 8-fold path to enlightenment.
Of course the whole charm in Buddhism is that it is not a dogma, and that Gautama Buddha just prior to passing away said: "Do not believe in anything simply because you have heard it. Do not believe in anything simply because it is spoken and rumored by many (…). But after observation and analysis, when you find that anything agrees with reason and is conducive to the good and benefit of one and all, then accept it and live up to it."
The idea is that one must look inside oneself, and this is where we find what we seek, given that we are all Buddhas :-).
And, roughly, all great spiritual traditions, and all great mystics, describe the same path – but using different words – and sometimes the dogma of a religion was added to it, which muddles things quite a bit.
Generally, "spiritual people" refer to "the path", not "the paths" :-) and they seem to understand each other. Of course you don’t need to be on "the path" – Buddhists don’t proselityze! And, as I say, no need to be a Buddhist to be Buddhist: we all are, by definition, according to the Buddhists ;-). You, for example, have lots of highly developed "Buddha aspects", e.g. non-attachment, live in the now, understand impermanence, no anger, no jealousy, fearlessness, help others, etc.
In summary: I think all this talk of "the path" is pretty much gibberish as long as you have not "experienced" the "there" the "path" is supposed to lead to, i.e. some form of "mystic" awareness – the spiritual path is "experiential" as they say. Everyone experiences mystical states of consciousness, but most people don’t really pay attention to them, like it happens when it happens. To be "on the path" is to start examining these things a little more closely. With meditation as a handy tool.
Like scuba divers explore the underwater world, Buddhists explore the human mind! :-)"
Recent Comments